Summary: The ICC has rejected accusations of bias after the West Indies and South Africa cricket teams were stranded in India for over a week following the T20 World Cup, while England departed within two days. Frustrated players from the stranded teams claimed they received no communication and accused the ICC of preferential treatment. The ICC stated all travel decisions were based solely on safety, feasibility, and welfare, citing different circumstances and routing options for each team.
Main Topics Covered:
1. Accusations of unequal treatment and bias by the ICC from stranded cricket teams.
2. The ICC's defense and rejection of those claims.
3. The logistical challenges and player frustrations caused by travel disruptions.
ICC rejects bias claims from stranded South Africa, West Indies cricketers
Frustrated players say they were left in the dark for days over their travel while England flew out within two days.
Cricket’s governing body has rejected suggestions of unequal treatment after the West Indies and South Africa squads were stranded in India for more than a week following their exit from the T20 World Cup, while England flew out in less than two days.
The International Cricket Council (ICC) has been accused of giving preferential treatment to one team over the other two amid the travel chaos resulting from airspace closures and rerouted flights because of the war in the Middle East.
Recommended Stories
list of 3 items- list 1 of 3Missile strikes, no flights: Middle East conflict disrupts global sport
- list 2 of 3Messi censured for meeting and applauding Trump amid US attacks on Iran
- list 3 of 3One Iranian football team member changes mind after Australia grants asylum
However, the ICC said on Wednesday it “rejects any suggestion that these decisions have been driven by anything other than safety, feasibility and welfare”.
“We understand that players, coaches, support staff and their families who have completed their ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2026 campaigns are anxious to return home,” it said in a statement.
Cricket West Indies said on Tuesday its squad had waited nine days for a charter flight that was “repeatedly delayed”, calling the uncertainty “increasingly distressing”.
West Indies players were leaving India on commercial flights in batches 10 days after their scheduled departure, which led to frustrated players airing their thoughts in social media posts.
The ICC said nine West Indies players and staff members were already travelling to the Caribbean, with the remaining 16 booked on flights departing India within 24 hours.
Indian media reported that a charter flight for the West Indies and South Africa Twenty20 World Cup teams scheduled to fly to Johannesburg before continuing on to Antigua was cancelled earlier on Tuesday.
Meanwhile, South Africa, who have been stranded in India since March 4, will begin to fly home on Wednesday, with the entire contingent departing in the next 36 hours, the ICC said.
England flew home less than two days after being beaten in the semifinals, prompting criticism of the ICC from the South African and West Indian camps.
Darren Sammy, head coach of West Indies, began venting his frustration on social media on the fifth day since his team’s exit from the T20 World Cup.
“I just wanna go home,” he wrote on X, followed by another tweet requesting an update after being left in the dark for five days.
Three days after South Africa were knocked out, in the first semifinal, their players Quinton De Kock and David Miller said the team had heard nothing from the ICC regarding their departure while England, who were eliminated a day later in the second semifinal had already left.
“England are leaving before us somehow?! Strange how different teams have more pull than others,” De Kock wrote in an Instagram story.
Miller, commenting on a post announcing England’s departure, said: “It doesn’t take the ICC long to organise England charter. WI have been waiting for 7 days for a charter and SA coming on 4 days now. And yet we still wait.”
The ICC said the criticism was “incorrect” and that there was no comparison between arrangements for South Africa and the West Indies and those made for England, “which arose from separate circumstances, routing options and different travel conditions”.
“Throughout this period, the ICC’s overriding priority has been the safety and welfare of everyone affected,” the sport’s global governing body said.
“We will not move people until we are satisfied that the travel solution in place is safe, and that commitment will not change.”
Meridiano
