Nvidia's latest 595.71 graphics driver is reportedly imposing artificial voltage limits on some RTX 40- and 50-series GPUs, reducing overclocking headroom by up to 200MHz. The issue appears to be a bug, as it inconsistently affects certain models and is not mentioned in official patch notes.
User reports and demonstrations show significant performance drops for overclocked cards, though some models, like specific Gigabyte and PNY variants, remain unaffected. Nvidia has not yet officially acknowledged the problem, leaving open the possibility of a future corrective driver update.
The main topics covered are a problematic Nvidia driver update, its impact on GPU overclocking and voltage, inconsistent effects across different hardware models, and the lack of an official response from Nvidia.
Nvidia driver 595.71 reportedly limits overclocks on some GeForce GPUs, but not all — troubled driver release seems to stifle voltages on RTX 40- and 50-series cards
Some cards are immune to the voltage limitations that appear to be present in release 595.71.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Nvidia's latest 595.71 driver release has reportedly introduced new problems not seen in last week's highly problematic 595.59 driver—a release so troubled that Nvidia had to pull it a few days ago. Several user reports, and at least one YouTuber, have discovered that release 595.71 is limiting GPU overclocking on many RTX 40- and 50-series graphics cards. The most highly impacted models are said to be losing around 200MHz of overclocking headroom compared to previous releases.
The problem appears to be artificial voltage limitations that have been applied, either purposefully or accidentally, in driver 595.71. YouTuber Bang4BuckPC gamer demonstrated his Asus TUF Gaming RTX 5090, losing 65mv of voltage headroom, and locking the card to under one volt. The lost voltage reduced his overclocking headroom by around 171MHz, from 3,165MHz to just under 3,000MHz. However, this behavior only occurs if the GPU core offset exceeds 150MHz. Using a 150MHz offset or lower, the GPU won't restrict voltage and will hit up to 1.060v.
User reports with similar issues have also been shared on the Nvidia forums. One user with an RTX 5080 reported that their GPU used to hit 3,100 to 3,200MHz with previous drivers and now can only achieve 2,955MHz with 595.71. Another RTX 5080 owner published their own 3DMark scores with the previous 591.86 driver compared to 595.71, with a hefty 450MHz GPU overclock, and found the newer driver was running the GPU 300MHz lower and pulling 43 fewer watts, from 403W to 360W.
However, not all RTX 50 series GPUs appear to be affected. Curiously, three commenters on Bang4BuckPC Gamer's aforementioned YouTube video with Gigabyte Aorus Master RTX 5090 graphics cards report having no restrictions whatsoever. Another RTX 5090 owner with a PNY Epic OC variant reported no issues as well, reporting a max overclock of 3,157MHz with the latest driver. Two RTX 5070 owners, one with an Asus variant and the other a MSI Gaming Trio OC, also reported no issues.
It's possible, however, that those owners have had better luck in the silicon lottery such that their cards' dynamic voltage and frequency scaling curves aren't affected by this apparent bug. In any case, the new problem has generated a lot of angry comments from gaming enthusiasts, with several blaming AI code for ruining Nvidia's drivers.
Nvidia has not officially acknowledged the issue (yet), but the artificial voltage limits do appear to be a bug rather than an official change. The Nvidia patch notes don't mention any new voltage limits, and certain GeForce RTX GPU models apparently aren't subject to any limitations while running 595.71. We'll have to see whether the company issues another corrective release or hotfix driver in the near future, with any further explanation for the issue.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.
-
warezme I keep my 4090 voltage limited by 84% so this is a non issue for me but it would be pretty annoying if it was limiting cards default voltage and limiting performance from advertised values. It doesn't sound like its doing that. Most overclocks unless one is dealing with exotic cooling and very high voltages don't really yield that significant of an improvement from stock performance. At least not enough to warranty damaging or limiting the lifespan of the card.Reply -
txfeinbergs Reply
Yeah, I just stick with the factory overclocks. The card is already so overpowered why risk damaging it in today's environment of $3700 5090s.warezme said:I keep my 4090 voltage limited by 84% so this is a non issue for me but it would be pretty annoying if it was limiting cards default voltage and limiting performance from advertised values. It doesn't sound like its doing that. Most overclocks unless one is dealing with exotic cooling and very high voltages don't really yield that significant of an improvement from stock performance. At least not enough to warranty damaging or limiting the lifespan of the card.
Meridiano
