A sprawling Chinese web novel, The Morning Star of Lingao, features modern engineers traveling back to the Ming Dynasty to trigger an industrial revolution and alter China's historical trajectory. The story emerged from online forums in 2006, directly engaging with China's historical angst over its decline relative to Europe and the "Great Divergence."
The novel's pragmatic, development-focused ideology aligned with the rise of the online "Industrial Party," which prioritized state-led industrialization and material progress over political concepts like democracy or freedom. The narrative reflects a significant intellectual current in modern China that views relentless economic and technological building as the nation's central path to power and salvation.
The main topics covered are the web novel The Morning Star of Lingao, its origins in online Chinese discourse, and its connection to the "Industrial Party" ideology that prioritizes state-led development and industrialization above political liberalization.
Ma Qianzhu was unsatisfied with Chinese progress. An engineer at a large state-owned enterprise, he belonged to a generation that grew up believing engineering is destiny, that China’s future would be built, bolt by bolt, by people like him. Then Ma discovered something extraordinary: a wormhole to the late Ming Dynasty. With more than 500 peers, he commandeered a ship and traveled back in time 400 years, to a preindustrial China wracked by foreign invasion and internal decay. Their mission: trigger an industrial revolution in the past that would, in the future, make modern China great (again).
This, strictly speaking, did not happen. It’s the plot of The Morning Star of Lingao (临高启明), a sprawling, collectively written science-fiction web novel that has consumed a corner of the Chinese internet for nearly two decades. It now totals millions of words. It has never been translated into English. Almost no one in the West knows it exists.
But I would argue—somewhat less strictly speaking—that the events of the book did happen. That the time travel worked. And that the secret to understanding modern China is all right there, contained within its prophetic, often frightening pages.
In 2006, a post went up on SC BBS, China’s earliest military-themed message board: What would you do if you could travel back to the Ming Dynasty with modern knowledge? The question struck a nerve. The Ming Dynasty occupies a painful place in Chinese historical consciousness. It was a period when Chinese civilization entered a long decline, ending in the so-called Great Divergence. Europe embraced discovery, ascent, and construction; China sealed itself off. Joseph Needham’s famous question—“Why did modern science develop in Europe but not in China?”—has haunted modern Chinese intellectual life ever since.
The Morning Star of Lingao emerged as a kind of internet-fueled continuation of this historic discourse. As more people found the original post, forum discussions crystallized into serious, collective story-writing. If you could travel back to the Ming Dynasty with modern knowledge, these users decided, well, you’d obviously industrialize before Europe and win modernity.
Not everyone quite saw it that way. This was also the moment when China’s internet began producing its first generation of liberal-minded intellectuals, who debated everything in a relatively free online space—air pollution, labor rights, the brutal relocations preceding Beijing’s 2008 Olympic spectacle. I was a teenager coming of age in this internet. I bore witness to the Arab Spring and its Chinese-inspired “Jasmine Revolution.” I devoured Charter 08, a manifesto for political reform and human rights. In 2011, while I was in high school, the renowned blogger Han Han released his pro-democracy trilogy—“On Revolution,” “On Democracy,” “On Freedom.”
The Lingao writers had little interest in these values. If the novel didn’t exactly inspire China’s effort to industrialize, it certainly reflected and reinforced it, serving as a kind of sacred text. In 2011, a nationalist economist named Wang Xiaodong coined the term “Industrial Party”—not a literal party (there’s effectively only one in China) but a way to refer to a circle of internet thinkers and influencers writing essays and cheering on plans the state had initiated. As the scholar Li Qiang has observed, the Industrial Party emphasized a pragmatic attitude of “shelving disputes and focusing on development.” The force they celebrated, ostensibly derived from industrial civilization, was actually development itself—progress as ideology, building as salvation. Revolution, democracy, freedom: These were distractions, even obstacles. What mattered was building. What mattered was speed.
And perhaps no figure better embodied the Industrial Party’s evolution from internet subculture to influential public voice than the man who inspired the character of Ma Qianzhu—Ma Qianzu.
That’s right: the fictional engineer in Lingao is based on a real-life engineer of the same name. (Or nearly: Their names differ by two Chinese characters.) The writing process for the book was extremely decentralized, so attribution is often messy, but there’s a consensus that the real-life Ma was one of the book’s writers. Ma—whose real name is actually Ren Chonghao, but he goes by his pen name—trained as a civil engineer and worked at the Suzhou Planning & Design Research Institute. He poured his own dreams and convictions into his fictional counterpart.
Ma’s moment arrived in 2011. On July 23, two high-speed trains collided near Wenzhou, killing 40 people. The accident traumatized the nation for what it seemed to reveal about the costs of China’s breakneck pace of development. A prominent essay captured the mood, its title becoming a rallying cry: “China, Slow Down, Wait for Your People.” The prose read almost like prayer: “China, please stop your flying pace, wait for your people, wait for your soul, wait for your morality, wait for your conscience!”
Ma and other Industrial Party voices responded with a counteroffensive. The solution wasn’t to slow down but to double down, they said—to learn from mistakes, to push through the difficult phase when new technologies were still being mastered. And key to their campaign was Lingao itself. The writing of it became a phenomenon across Chinese internet forums in the 2010s: Its open source ethos and collaborative methods deeply appealed to China’s burgeoning tech community. Beyond regular meetups among core contributors, Lingao’s creation fostered the formation of China’s “keyboard politics”—online communities where users engage in fierce debates about governance, policy, and national direction under the protection of pseudonyms. These conversations became staging grounds for political arguments that couldn’t happen elsewhere, where amateur policy wonks, military enthusiasts, and armchair strategists honed their worldviews. In 2012, the nationalist commentary website Guancha (think of it as China’s Breitbart) was founded, and its complex entanglement with Industrial Party thought and personnel networks demonstrated how far Lingao’s influence extended beyond mere time-travel fiction.
Industrial Party ideology ends up being quite Darwinian. What matters most is the power that flows from industrial capacity. This contributes to what scholars refer to as the party’s “aesthetic.” Fred Gao, a Beijing-based journalist who identifies with the Industrial Party and who briefly worked for Guancha, told me: “These people view industrialization as the highest form of beauty. Building things from nothing—that’s their romanticism.”
Of course, the techno-nationalist impulse transcends borders. “Elon Musk is the ultimate Industrial Party figure,” Gao said. Musk’s vision of colonizing Mars, his impatience with regulation, his worship of engineering solutions, his conviction that making physical things matters more than anything else—his “aesthetic has strong resonances with the Chinese Industrial Party,” Gao said. What differs is simply the political system that channels it.
Almost nobody, including me, can finish all the chapters of Lingao (to say nothing of the more than 1,400 derivative works). It’s not just that it’s too long. Reading it is quite painful. The novel’s language and narrative structure are aggressively anti-literary. To write beautifully would be bourgeois, the Industrial Party seemed to believe. Technical descriptions veer into what feels like self-indulgence, an uncomfortable disregard for readers without STEM backgrounds.
The book asks questions like: How do you solve energy problems when you can’t drill for oil? How do you begin mechanization without the machine tools to make machine tools? How do you produce nitric acid when you’re starting from literally dirt? From Chapter 22, as the 500 time travelers plan their expedition to colonize Lingao County in Hainan (the southern island in China):
It reminds me of Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe, published in 1719. In the story, Crusoe reconstructs the distant island’s physicality from first principles. He builds tools, domesticates animals, plants crops, constructs shelter, makes pottery, bakes bread, sews clothes. The novel works like an instruction manual because, just like Lingao, that is the point. Robinson Crusoe is among the first works of fiction to treat industriousness itself as heroic.
Yet Lingao gets at something more specific than Defoe’s Enlightenment universalism: It reflects the moral worldview of China during its 21st-century industrial acceleration and nationalism. Consider this passage—the scene when the crew has just time-traveled after 47 chapters of preparation:
This is the emotional core of Lingao—and of the Industrial Party worldview. The novel never separates technological progress from nationalist revival. Building blast furnaces is patriotism. Engineering is loving your country. The characters in the novel are intoxicated by their mission, and the readers are intoxicated by the fantasy. And perhaps most importantly, the writers are intoxicated by the act of collective world-building itself—the collaborative construction of an alternate Chinese modernity.
Between 2000 and the mid-2020s, China’s manufacturing output exploded nearly eightfold. The country became “the world’s factory” not gradually but suddenly, and a feedback loop emerged: The Industrial Party worldview and China’s actual industrialization reinforced each other. Meanwhile, Lingao provided a narrative framework that made China’s development inevitable and righteous.
For educated urbanites, especially those with technical backgrounds, it felt like inhabiting science fiction. The Lingao contributors and readers—typically 20- to 40-year-old males in cities, many with STEM careers—were both witnesses to and agents of this transformation. They worked in the factories, the construction firms, the engineering offices. They experienced firsthand what concentrated state resources and marshaled technical expertise could achieve.
As Dan Wang argues in his book Breakneck, China has become the quintessential “engineering state.” When Xi Jinping stacks his government with aerospace and defense executives, when he demands manufacturing remain at 28 percent of GDP, when he boasts that China produces something in all UN industrial categories—he’s speaking the Industrial Party gospel. “Productive forces are what fundamentally drive the development of human society,” he said in a May 2024 speech, “and are the final cause of all social and political changes.” Everything else—democracy, rights, culture—is derivative, subordinate, ultimately irrelevant compared to the question of whether you can manufacture advanced semiconductors or build hypersonic missiles.
But that first generation of liberal-minded intellectuals—the ones I grew up idolizing—hasn’t given up. In fact, in recent years, cracks have appeared in the Industrial Party’s armor. “Look at Ma Qianzu now,” says Fred Gao. “These past two years, he still talks about industrial systems, but increasingly he’s discussing socialized childcare, how local governments should spend money, local debt problems, reflections on unlimited borrowing. The pure Industrial Party worldview—that building solves everything—can’t address the structural problems China faces now.”
It’s not just Ma. One of the original Lingao authors, writing under the pen name “The Boaster,” has largely withdrawn from public discourse. Those close to the project say he’s focused on his day job, occasionally updating the novel but no longer engaging in the debates that once defined the Industrial Party circle. Even Wang, the economist who coined the name, has moderated his views. In recent years, he has said that China is not yet ready to sever ties with the West—a striking retreat from his earlier confrontational nationalism.
For many, “the Chinese Dream” has shattered. Birth rates have plummeted. Unemployment among youth has reached staggering levels. Can the “building more” spirit of Lingao still solve problems? I see doubt everywhere. You can’t engineer your way out of a crisis of meaning when an entire generation of young people has chosen to—as the Chinese idiom goes—“lie flat,” rejecting the promise that endless work leads to prosperity.
In a sense, China’s Industrial Party has lost its innocence. Just as in the endless Lingao, the boundless worship of industrialization has given way to more tangled narratives. In one of the novel’s endings (there are many), the time travelers finally succeed in founding their nation. “All the time travelers gathered—a rare occasion—in the Transmigration Palace, a replica of the Soviet Palace designed by Ma Qianzhu himself ... The banquet tables overflowed with unimaginably exquisite foods ... rare wines of every kind ... truly a scene of indulgent excess and intoxication.” The dystopian absurdity reveals a degree of self-awareness: that power, taken to its extreme, leads to corruption and despotism; that if history can be rewritten, the real challenge comes after victory.
What Say You?
Let us know what you think about this article in the comments below. Alternatively, you can submit a letter to the editor at mail@wired.com.
Meridiano
